A bill on improving the management of apartment buildings, before leaving on vacation to the deputies did not have time, deferring to the autumn session. And perhaps for the better, as some provisions of the instrument caused heated debate and professionals clearly need improvement. The bill is important and necessary moments, said yesterday the deputy Galina Khovanskaya. For example, it eliminates the difficulty in changing the "power" in the house. Today, if, for example, tenants, property owners banded together in partnership and decided to change the management company, the standard is a situation where "of delayed" house manager mends all sorts of obstacles, does not provide accounting documentation at home. The amendments provide for liability for such fans put a spoke in the wheel. It is also widely homeowners faced with the fact that they get a "house manager" reliable information about its work, the calculations on the cost of services, work plans at home and so it is simply impossible. The bill would give property owners into the hands of a serious "stick": managers who are "filtered" information and thereby mislead people, now threatens to do a crash with the market - the court may deprive them of their right to engage in professional activities. At the same time most controversial item in the bill (and it has already attracted attention and aroused heated discussions) - the proposal to toughen the penalties for the worst defaulters for public services including the possibility of eviction from their own homes and billing meters freed up for sale. To be fair to note that the current law such a rule already in place: but only for the employers of council flats. They have, incidentally, not so much - after all, about 90 percent of housing in the country privatized or bought. Debtors who do not pay within six months heat, water and light, it is possible for the court to move to a so-called agile foundation for standards dorms (6 "squares" to a family member). But for apartment owners, this "draconian measure" has not yet been distributed. The bill proposes to introduce the possibility of eviction and owners. "We want to achieve just that prompt payer finally ceased to suffer from the fact that it allows hypothetical neighbor does not pay the rent - the author explains the bill deputy Andrei Chirkin. - It often happens? One staircase live two people . One regularly make payments, thereby directing their funds for the maintenance, repair, improvement at home (also known as common property), the second in the meantime for years without pay. As a result, under-funded housing, and in the end - dilapidation of the housing stock. " With the deputy judge agrees Institute for Urban Economics, Dmitry Gordeev, who also took part in writing the bill. "The threat of eviction - this is normal, since the malicious harm debtors conscientious owners, which is objectively the vast majority - says Gordeev. - So regulate the responsibility of the European countries, including those with a similar mentality to our people - in Hungary, Slovakia and Estonia. This leads to the fact that the debtor is almost absent, as there is certainty of a court decision. No one is suggesting just evict people on the street - either in Europe or in Russia. But the populism of politicians who oppose the introduction of this measure will be a signal to society: You can not pay. She "vs." Galina Khovanskaya, however, yesterday made a reservation that the responses to the debtor actually needed. But to the formulation, which is now in the bill, the mass of "gotchas." Eviction will threaten not only the malicious non-payers ( as in the case of employers), but those who do not pay in full. Meanwhile, there are cases when in receipt of specified services, which people do not get (for example, the fee for a radio receiving station and antenna, which residents do not enjoy). While you will sort things out with CC, you can "ring out" maneuver to fund ... In addition, the system of housing subsidies at a time when central regions no longer receive financial aid, runs are not always clearly and smoothly. Of course, the state should give resursosnabzhayuschim and organizations, and managing housing ( in whatever form it may happen Management) tools against debtors. But poor social support system aimed at just that people are not pushed into debt should run smoothly. In short, the fall, when MPs return from vacation it will be something to think about. Before making a final decision.
No comments:
Post a Comment